Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Jerrold E KEM Di SMP Hanuru

Novita Loma  Sahertian; David Ming; Hestyn Natal Istinatun; Junio Richson Sirait

doi:10.52489/jupak.v2i1.26

Authors

Novita Loma Sahertian Institut Agama Kristen Ambon, Indonesia
David Ming Sekolah Tinggi Teologi KADESI Bogor
Hestyn Natal Istinatun Sekolah Tinggi Teologi KADESI Yogyakarta
Junio Richson Sirait Sekolah Tinggi Teologi KADESI Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52489/jupak.v2i1.26

Keywords:

Cooperative Learning Model, type of time token, Christian Education subjects

Abstract

This study intends to apply a learning model including: development of a syllabus and a Learning Implementation Plan (RPP) cooperative type time token type in PAK and Character In Class VIII, the material of Allah loves the world. The method used in this research was the descriptive qualitative research method. Data were collected through observation, interview, and literature study and analyzed in-depth and described descriptively. The action hypothesis is a temporary answer in the form of action on the formulation of the problems set out in this classroom action research which is: student learning outcomes will increase "can be accepted. Based on the results of the implementation of classroom action research with the title implementation of the Jerrold E camp learning model in Christian education (PAK) and Character subjects in junior high schools, especially in Hauru Christian Middle School in class VIII which lasted for 2 research cycles, it can be concluded: Christian Education (PAK) and Character work effectively, so student learning outcomes will increase.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A.M., S. (2005). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Boehlke, R. R. (2002). Sejarah Perkembangan Pikir dan Praktek PAK II. BPK Gunung Mulia.

Christiana Demaja Wilhelmina Sahertian. (2003). Pengaruh penggunaan bahan ajar dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matakuliah strategi pembelajaran pendidikan agama Kristen (PAK) mahasiswa sekolah tinggi agama kristen protestan negeri (STAKPN) Ambon. UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MALANG.

Clark. (1990). Dinamika Pendidikan Agama Kristen. BPK Gunung Mulia.

Cully, I. (2006). Dinamika Pendidikan Kristen. BPK Gunung Mulia.

Deliarnov. (1996). Motivasi untuk meraih sukses. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

E.Camp, J. (1994). Proses Perancangan Pengajaran.

Enklaar, I. H., & Homrighausen, E. G. (2011). Pendidikan Agama Kristen. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.

Koeswara, E. (1986). Motivasi: Teori dan Penelitiannya. Angkasa.

Kristianto, P. L. (2006). Prinsip & Praktik Pendidikan Agama Kristen. ANDI OFFISET.

MEIER, PAUL D, P., MINIRTH, F. B., WICHERN, F. B., & RATCLIFF, D. E. (2009). PENGANTAR PSIKOLOGI & KONSELING KRISTEN. Andi. //e-library.undana.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=28178

Rooijakkers, A. (1991). Mengajar Dengan Sukses: Petunjuk untuk merencanakan dan menyampaikan pengajaran. PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Slavin, R. E. (1997). Educational psychology: theory and practice. Allyn and Bacon.

Sloat, R. E. C. L. J. A. K. (1991). Christian Education Foundation for The Future. Moody Bible Institute,.

Sopah, D. (2000). Pengaruh model pembelajaran dan motivasi berprestasi terhadap hasil belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 5(022), 122–137.

Suparlan, Y. B. (1984). Aliran-aliran baru dalam pendidikan. Andi Offset.

Suparno, P. (2004). Guru demokratis di era reformasi pendidikan. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

WINKEL, W. S. (1996). Psikologi pengajaran. Grasindo.

Zaluchu, S. E. (2020). Strategi Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif Di Dalam Penelitian Agama. Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili Dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat, 4(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.46445/ejti.v4i1.167